Petition for John G. Hull of Barbour county citizens to His Excellency Governor A. B. Moore; October 8, 1859
Item
Identifier
Q133888_Q133891
Title
Petition for John G. Hull of Barbour county citizens to His Excellency Governor A. B. Moore; October 8, 1859
Rights
This material may be protected under U. S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S. Code) which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. Though ADAH has physical ownership of the material in its collections, in some cases we may not own the copyright to the material. It is the patron's obligation to determine and satisfy copyright restrictions when publishing or otherwise distributing materials found in our collections.
Type
text
Creator
Unknown
Date
1859 October 8
Description
From the Alabama Department of Archives and History Governor A. B. Moore Collection. Citizens of Barbour county petition the governor for John G. Hull's $200 fine to be removed.
Language
English
Place
Barbour County (Ala.), Clayton (Ga).
Publisher
Alabama Department of Archives and History. (electronic version)
Contributor
Joseph DeFrank
Relation
Q133892_Q133893
transcription
State of Alabama
Barbour County To His Excellency
Andrew B. Moore, Governor of the state of Alabama
The [?] of the undersigned John [b.?] Hill respectful[y?] represent with your Excellency, that a bill of [?] was found against your
[?] at the [?] [?] of the Circuit Court for said county, for gaming, and that your [?] was arrested by vitrue of a Capias issued from
said Court, and gave loud [wette?] once [gamer?] [Rose?] as [?] in the [?] of two hundred dollars [Royalle?] to the state of Alabama
in case [?] should fail to appear at the next term of said Court, a [from?] term to [?] there offer to [answr?] said bill of indictment. [Love?]
[?] for there represents court, youre Excellency That at the fall term of 183-8 of said court, your [?] there a resident of Americans in the
State of Georgia came to Clayton, the place of holding said court, one Monday morning of the week of said [lema?] where the criminal [?] was [?]
up, and remained on hand in Clayton where said Court was held, [?] [?] of the same week, when he was [informed?] by Haywood [Pickens?] [Senior?],
who had examined said Criminal [docket?]- that [petitioner?] case would not [journalist?] be reached [to?] that day, and that he would be safe
in [going?] away until next [morning?] - [Petitioner?] further [alleges?] that having [infer?] that [?] in the tour of Midway about eighteen
miles from Clayton he left - the [heart?] for the [justice?] of [artudies?] to [a?], with the introduction of [reframing?] next morning.
On the day grow [justitication?] left Clayton (Wednesday) the said case against [Justitication?] was called and a [forfeiture?] [Iakeno?], [owed?]
a indigenous [mini?] [oulened?] your [hip?] [said?] [hermit?] [Justitication?] for the sum of $200.00 on account of [Justitication?] absence.
[Petitioner?] further alleges that he did reading early over Thursday morning to [chard?] his trial, when he found that said [forfeiture?] had
keen [irkes?], and the case continued. [Love?] [Jedidence?] was then [reorganized?] with one James Rose in the sum of two hundred dollars to
offer at the next [terra?] [thereofes?] of said Court to answer said lies of indictement [Peditioner?] [furture?] alleges that at the time of the
[billing?] of said Court at the spring [Lema?] 1859, it was impossible for [Justitication?] to attend said [Lema?] of the court, by [reason?] of
the prevalence of the [dual-fox?] your [justification?] then residing in [St.?] [James?], Georgia, was to [Columbia?], Alabama, and the
[Goverenancy?] Court of Balfour [?], [honors?] [?] guards to prevent the [ingreds?] of any [indecency?] under whatever [jreduxt?] from the place
[Justiticaion?] then lived into the said Court and [justitication?] alleges that by review of said [arterdies?] the said [Lema?] of the Court
[Lome?] [Petitioner?] further [addresses?] that in [evaporance?] of his [offense?] of said [Shrimp?] [Ferra?] 1859. The said judge meant [miri?]
was rendered final against {young?] [Justitication?] and his said security [farmers?] Rojo for the said review of the laundered dollars - For the
reasons set forth your [Justitication?] {thay's?] your excellency that an order may be guaranteed re-authority of the said sum of money, and
[engineer?] the collection of the same under the execution to the [ignore?] from said Court, your [justitiary?] having at the [Fall?] Lema 1859
of Said Court appeared and reorganized with sufficient [surities?] for his future [offerance?] to [answer?] said bill- and that your excellency
will grant each future order as shall seem next of [justice] in said court [+?] [year?] [jutitication?] as in [that?] [found?] will even jury.
John G. Hill
Ms. Stacy Alabama | G.G.Q. Williams Judge
Barbour County | of probate for said county
and Clarke [Caprero?] and [Ruper?] of the [meow?]
and [sease?] of said Court [hamby orphy?]
[That?] John [G.?] Hill whose name is
[legend?] to the foregoing Petition appears
[before?] me in prison on [May?] Day
an was by me duly [appear?] [lamentmant?]
[of?] [mie?] saw Petition and I [earthly?] that
he is the person that he [represents?] himself
to be [slain?] under my hand and
[jrae?] of affair this 28th October 1859
[J.J.?] Williams Judge of Probate
Barbour County To His Excellency
Andrew B. Moore, Governor of the state of Alabama
The [?] of the undersigned John [b.?] Hill respectful[y?] represent with your Excellency, that a bill of [?] was found against your
[?] at the [?] [?] of the Circuit Court for said county, for gaming, and that your [?] was arrested by vitrue of a Capias issued from
said Court, and gave loud [wette?] once [gamer?] [Rose?] as [?] in the [?] of two hundred dollars [Royalle?] to the state of Alabama
in case [?] should fail to appear at the next term of said Court, a [from?] term to [?] there offer to [answr?] said bill of indictment. [Love?]
[?] for there represents court, youre Excellency That at the fall term of 183-8 of said court, your [?] there a resident of Americans in the
State of Georgia came to Clayton, the place of holding said court, one Monday morning of the week of said [lema?] where the criminal [?] was [?]
up, and remained on hand in Clayton where said Court was held, [?] [?] of the same week, when he was [informed?] by Haywood [Pickens?] [Senior?],
who had examined said Criminal [docket?]- that [petitioner?] case would not [journalist?] be reached [to?] that day, and that he would be safe
in [going?] away until next [morning?] - [Petitioner?] further [alleges?] that having [infer?] that [?] in the tour of Midway about eighteen
miles from Clayton he left - the [heart?] for the [justice?] of [artudies?] to [a?], with the introduction of [reframing?] next morning.
On the day grow [justitication?] left Clayton (Wednesday) the said case against [Justitication?] was called and a [forfeiture?] [Iakeno?], [owed?]
a indigenous [mini?] [oulened?] your [hip?] [said?] [hermit?] [Justitication?] for the sum of $200.00 on account of [Justitication?] absence.
[Petitioner?] further alleges that he did reading early over Thursday morning to [chard?] his trial, when he found that said [forfeiture?] had
keen [irkes?], and the case continued. [Love?] [Jedidence?] was then [reorganized?] with one James Rose in the sum of two hundred dollars to
offer at the next [terra?] [thereofes?] of said Court to answer said lies of indictement [Peditioner?] [furture?] alleges that at the time of the
[billing?] of said Court at the spring [Lema?] 1859, it was impossible for [Justitication?] to attend said [Lema?] of the court, by [reason?] of
the prevalence of the [dual-fox?] your [justification?] then residing in [St.?] [James?], Georgia, was to [Columbia?], Alabama, and the
[Goverenancy?] Court of Balfour [?], [honors?] [?] guards to prevent the [ingreds?] of any [indecency?] under whatever [jreduxt?] from the place
[Justiticaion?] then lived into the said Court and [justitication?] alleges that by review of said [arterdies?] the said [Lema?] of the Court
[Lome?] [Petitioner?] further [addresses?] that in [evaporance?] of his [offense?] of said [Shrimp?] [Ferra?] 1859. The said judge meant [miri?]
was rendered final against {young?] [Justitication?] and his said security [farmers?] Rojo for the said review of the laundered dollars - For the
reasons set forth your [Justitication?] {thay's?] your excellency that an order may be guaranteed re-authority of the said sum of money, and
[engineer?] the collection of the same under the execution to the [ignore?] from said Court, your [justitiary?] having at the [Fall?] Lema 1859
of Said Court appeared and reorganized with sufficient [surities?] for his future [offerance?] to [answer?] said bill- and that your excellency
will grant each future order as shall seem next of [justice] in said court [+?] [year?] [jutitication?] as in [that?] [found?] will even jury.
John G. Hill
Ms. Stacy Alabama | G.G.Q. Williams Judge
Barbour County | of probate for said county
and Clarke [Caprero?] and [Ruper?] of the [meow?]
and [sease?] of said Court [hamby orphy?]
[That?] John [G.?] Hill whose name is
[legend?] to the foregoing Petition appears
[before?] me in prison on [May?] Day
an was by me duly [appear?] [lamentmant?]
[of?] [mie?] saw Petition and I [earthly?] that
he is the person that he [represents?] himself
to be [slain?] under my hand and
[jrae?] of affair this 28th October 1859
[J.J.?] Williams Judge of Probate
Subject
Moore, Andrew B. (Andrew Barry), 1807-1873.; Crime--Alabama--History.; Crime-Georgia-History.