Feb 5: Senators urge the administration to take the virus more seriously. The Senate acquits President Trump after voting against subpoenaing witnesses, including John Bolton. Republican Mitt Romney is the first senator in history to vote to oust a president from the same political party.
Feb 6: Chinese doctor and whistleblower, Dr. Li Wenliang, dies from COVID. First actual COVID death in the U.S. happens. Autopsies done in mid-April on the bodies of two people who died at home on Feb. 6 and Feb. 17 showed they were positive for the virus. Trump celebrates his acquittal in his Senate impeachment trial, Chinese authorities begin house to house searches to find people who are sick with the new coronavirus. The new England Journal of Medicine backtracks on an earlier preprint saying that coronavirus symptoms could be spread asymptomatically. It concedes that it does not have irrefutable proof. The medical community is left unsure.*
Sen. Romney’s full statement on Trump’s first impeachment trial, Feb 5, 2020
Donald Trump, State of the Union Speech, February 5, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xb1xHhGJjJk
Mitt Romney, “An Appalling Abuse of Public Trust”
-Transcript of Romney speech (watch above), February 5, 2020. Mitt Romney was the sole Republican to vote to convict President Trump on one article of impeachment.
The Constitution is at the foundation of our Republic’s success, and we each strive not to lose sight of our promise to defend it. The Constitution established the vehicle of impeachment that has occupied both houses of Congress for these many days. We have labored to faithfully execute our responsibilities to it. We have arrived at different judgments, but I hope we respect each other’s good faith.
The allegations made in the articles of impeachment are very serious. As a Senator-juror, I swore an oath, before God, to exercise “impartial justice.” I am a profoundly religious person. I take an oath before God as enormously consequential. I knew from the outset that being tasked with judging the President, the leader of my own party, would be the most difficult decision I have ever faced. I was not wrong.
The House Managers presented evidence supporting their case; the White House counsel disputed that case. In addition, the President’s team presented three defenses: first, that there can be no impeachment without a statutory crime; second, that the Bidens’ conduct justified the President’s actions; and third that the judgement of the President’s actions should be left to the voters. Let me first address each of those defenses.
The historic meaning of the words “high crimes and misdemeanors,” the writings of the Founders and my own reasoned judgement convince me that a president can indeed commit acts against the public trust that are so egregious that while they are not statutory crimes, they would demand removal from office. To maintain that the lack of a codified and comprehensive list of all the outrageous acts that a president might conceivably commit renders Congress powerless to remove a president defies reason.
The President’s counsel noted that Vice President Biden appeared to have a conflict of interest when he undertook an effort to remove the Ukrainian Prosecutor General. If he knew of the exorbitant compensation his son was receiving from a company actually under investigation, the Vice President should have recused himself. While ignoring a conflict of interest is not a crime, it is surely very wrong. With regards to Hunter Biden, taking excessive advantage of his father’s name is unsavory but also not a crime. Given that in neither the case of the father nor the son was any evidence presented by the President’s counsel that a crime had been committed, the President’s insistence that they be investigated by the Ukrainians is hard to explain other than as a political pursuit. There is no question in my mind that were their names not Biden, the President would never have done what he did. The defense argues that the Senate should leave the impeachment decision to the voters. While that logic is appealing to our democratic instincts, it is inconsistent with the Constitution’s requirement that the Senate, not the voters, try the president. Hamilton explained that the Founders’ decision to invest senators with this obligation rather than leave it to voters was intended to minimize—to the extent possible—the partisan sentiments of the public. This verdict is ours to render. The people will judge us for how well and faithfully we fulfilled our duty. The grave question the Constitution tasks senators to answer is whether the President committed an act so extreme and egregious that it rises to the level of a “high crime and misdemeanor.” Yes, he did. The President asked a foreign government to investigate his political rival. The President withheld vital military funds from that government to press it to do so. The President delayed funds for an American ally at war with Russian invaders. The President’s purpose was personal and political. Accordingly, the President is guilty of an appalling abuse of the public trust. What he did was not “perfect”— No, it was a flagrant assault on our electoral rights, our national security interests, and our fundamental values. Corrupting an election to keep oneself in office is perhaps the most abusive and destructive violation of one’s oath of office that I can imagine. In the last several weeks, I have received numerous calls and texts. Many demand that, in their words, “I stand with the team.” I can assure you that that thought has been very much on my mind. I support a great deal of what the President has done. I have voted with him 80% of the time. But my promise before God to apply impartial justice required that I put my personal feelings and biases aside. Were I to ignore the evidence that has been presented, and disregard what I believe my oath and the Constitution demands of me for the sake of a partisan end, it would, I fear, expose my character to history’s rebuke and the censure of my own conscience. I am aware that there are people in my party and in my state who will strenuously disapprove of my decision, and in some quarters, I will be vehemently denounced. I am sure to hear abuse from the President and his supporters. Does anyone seriously believe I would consent to these consequences other than from an inescapable conviction that my oath before God demanded it of me? I sought to hear testimony from John Bolton not only because I believed he could add context to the charges, but also because I hoped that what he said might raise reasonable doubt and thus remove from me the awful obligation to vote for impeachment. Like each member of this deliberative body, I love our country. I believe that our Constitution was inspired by Providence. I am convinced that freedom itself is dependent on the strength and vitality of our national character. As it is with each senator, my vote is an act of conviction. We have come to different conclusions, fellow senators, but I trust we have all followed the dictates of our conscience. I acknowledge that my verdict will not remove the President from office. The results of this Senate Court will in fact be appealed to a higher court: the judgement of the American people. Voters will make the final decision, just as the President’s lawyers have implored. My vote will likely be in the minority in the Senate. But irrespective of these things, with my vote, I will tell my children and their children that I did my duty to the best of my ability, believing that my country expected it of me. I will only be one name among many, no more or less, to future generations of Americans who look at the record of this trial. They will note merely that I was among the senators who determined that what the President did was wrong, grievously wrong. We’re all footnotes at best in the annals of history. But in the most powerful nation on earth, the nation conceived in liberty and justice, that is distinction enough for any citizen.
*If the pdf thumbnails are not appearing, please reload the page.
WHO Situation Report 17 – ERRATUM, Feb 6, 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200206-sitrep-17-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=17f0dca_4
A new supplementary appendix is now available with the correspondence, "Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany." https://t.co/NxQBV6uU6A https://t.co/TJWHJbhMYR
— NEJM (@NEJM) February 6, 2020
1. Symptom onset is in the eyes of the beholder?@NEJM appends timeline to a questioned report from Germany about asymptomatic spread of #2019nCoV from a Chinese woman. Details several days of mild symptoms, doesn’t walk back the claim she was still well. https://t.co/PAHmxz6cZP
— Helen Branswell (@HelenBranswell) February 6, 2020
Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany | NEJM – not really asymtomatic after all! https://t.co/FaeuRBaFFJ
— abebe haregewoin, MD, Ph. D. (@haregewoin) February 5, 2020
…And no one thought this little detail mattered enough to mention in the report?
— Eric Jenkins (@DrJ44074) February 5, 2020
Li Wenliang, the 34 year old Chinese doctor who first sounded alarm on the 2019 Novel Corona Virus, dies. He was never acknowledged for his effort but was instead questioned by Chinese Police for rumormongering. Reports say, his parents were also infected. pic.twitter.com/1OoyfCdeqU
— Raffy Tima (@raffytima) February 6, 2020
This is HeartBreaking. Two Patients in their 80s with corona virus in ICU wuhan 🤐😢 Lihat kedua pasangan ini melawan penyakit bersama2 😭😭 pic.twitter.com/yfBFS43NId
— Nads (@NadyaFtm) February 6, 2020
Just left the Administration briefing on Coronavirus. Bottom line: they aren’t taking this seriously enough. Notably, no request for ANY emergency funding, which is a big mistake. Local health systems need supplies, training, screening staff etc. And they need it now.
— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) February 5, 2020
I have long admired Mitt Romney, but never more than today. What an honorable man. https://t.co/58oKqXNg81
— Jeff Flake (@JeffFlake) February 5, 2020
BREAKING: US Senate votes to acquit President Trump on first article of impeachment, abuse of power. https://t.co/eS9gdAUWcJ pic.twitter.com/ZHe7ujx9e5
— NBC Politics (@NBCPolitics) February 5, 2020
I’ve studied the National Prayer Breakfast a good bit, and I can’t say how bizarre it is for a president to use the moment — traditionally one devoted to bipartisanship and unity — to strike such a petty, vindictive tone at the event. pic.twitter.com/bFJN1PmUoi
— Kevin M. Kruse (@KevinMKruse) February 6, 2020
Former Romney campaign spokesman says conviction decision is ‘motivated by bitterness and jealousy’ https://t.co/9bOHXWBSMJ
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) February 5, 2020
MITT ROMNEY to Fox News: “I do believe [Trump] should be removed from office.” pic.twitter.com/blaNvT9skA
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 5, 2020
WATCH: The GOP Senators who voted to acquit President Trump once called for him to be “kicked out of the party” and argued a “speck of dirt” was “more qualified” to be President. pic.twitter.com/BEF2kUqorR
— The Beat with Ari Melber on MSNBC 📺 (@TheBeatWithAri) February 5, 2020
* Timeline summaries at the top of the page come from a variety of sources:, including The American Journal of Managed Care COVID-19 Timeline (https://www.ajmc.com/view/a-timeline-of-covid19-developments-in-2020), the Just Security Group at the NYU School of Law (https://www.justsecurity.org/69650/timeline-of-the-coronavirus-pandemic-and-u-s-response/), the “10 Things,” daily entries from The Week (theweek.com), as well as a variety of newspapers and television programs.